Proportional, Progressive, and Regressive taxes

Taxes can be categorized by the effect they have on the allocation of income and wealth. A proportional tax is the kind of tax that imposes the same relative requirement on all the taxpayers—i.e., where tax liability and income grow in equal scale. A progressive tax is recognisable by a more than proportional rise in the tax liability in relation to the increase in income, and a regressive tax is characterized by a less than proportional increase in the comparative onus. Therefore, progressive taxes are thought of as removing the lack of equality in income distribution, but regressive taxes are found to increase these inequalities.

The taxes that are usually considered progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are categorically progressive, however, can become less so in the upper-income group—particularly if a taxpayer is permitted to reduce his tax base by declaring deductions or by removing some income components from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates that are applied to lower-income categories can also be more progressive if personal exemptions are declared.

Income measured over the course of a given year does not absolutely provide the most appropriate measure of taxpaying requirements. For example, transitory growth in income can be saved, and in temporary declines in income a taxpayer could decide to pay for consumption by reducing savings. So, if taxation is made comparable along with “permanent income,” it can be less regressive (or more progressive) than when it is held in comparison with annual income.

Sales taxes and excises (excepting luxuries) are generally regressive, because the portion of own income consumed or spent for specific goods lessens as the level of personal income increases. Poll taxes (aka head taxes), calculated as a fixed amount per capita, obviously are regressive.

It is not simple to term corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, due to uncertainty around the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of deciding who bears the tax burden is dependant crucially on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being decided.

In considering the economic effects of taxation, it is important to differentiate between varied ideas of tax rates. The statutory rates are those specified in law; usually these are marginal rates, but for some cases they are mean rates. Marginal income tax rates denote the fraction of incremental income taken by taxation when income grows by one dollar. Ergo, if tax burden rises by 45 cents when income rises by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax legislature usually contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that increase as income grows. Careful analysis of marginal tax rates need to regard provisions other than the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) reduces by 20 cents for each one-dollar rise in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points more than nominated in the statutory rates. Since marginal rates indicate how after-tax income is changed in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the necessary ones for assessing incentive effects of taxation. It is even more complicated to nominate the marginal effective tax rate to apply to income from business and capital, since it may be reliant on such factors as the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem shows that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is zero under a consumption-based tax.

Average income tax rates signify the percentage of total income that is required in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is in consideration for assessing the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate grows with income. Average income tax rates commonly increase with income, both because personal allowances are permitted for the taxpayer and dependents and also due to that marginal tax rates are graduated; on the flip side, preferential treatment of income received fundamentally by high-income households might dampen these effects, forcing regressivity, as indicated by average tax rates that decline as income rises.

For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.