Proportional, Progressive, and Regressive taxes
Taxes are categorized by the impact they have on the distribution of income and wealth. A proportional tax is the kind that impinges the same relative burden on every taxpayer—i.e., in the case where tax liability and income move in relative proportion. A progressive tax is recognised by a more than proportional increase in the tax burden relative to the rise in income, and a regressive tax is recognised by a less than proportional increase in the comparable liability. So, progressive taxes are regarded as reducing inequity in income distribution, while regressive taxes may have the effect of increasing these inequalities.
The taxes that are often believed to be progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are categorically progressive, however, might become less so in the upper-income categories—particularly if a taxpayer is allowed to reduce his tax base by nominating deductions or by removing some particular income components from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates when applied to lower-income categories could also be more progressive if personal exemptions are declared.
Income measured over the course of a given period might not definitely come up with the most suitable measure of taxpaying status. For example, transitory increases in income may be saved, and during temporary declines in income a taxpayer might select to pay for consumption by taking from savings. Thus, if taxation is compared with “permanent income,” it can be less regressive (or more progressive) than when compared with annual income.
Sales taxes and excises (excepting those on luxuries) are generally regressive, because the portion of personal income consumed or spent for specific goods lowers as the level of personal income rises. Poll taxes (also known as head taxes), calculated as a standard amount per capita, patently are regressive.
It is not simple to dictate corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, because of the uncertainty about the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of deciding who bears the tax burden rests essentially on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being decided.
In considering the economic effect of taxation, it is essential to distinguish between differing ideas of tax rates. The statutory rates are those dictated in the law; generally speaking these are marginal rates, but in some cases they are mean rates. Marginal income tax rates indicate the fraction of incremental income that is taken by taxation when income grows by one dollar. So, if tax liability rises by 45 cents when income increases by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax legislature usually contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that increase as income increases. Heavy analysis of marginal tax rates should take into account provisions as well as the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) lessens by 20 cents for each one-dollar growth in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points more than specified by the statutory rates. Since marginal rates signify how after-tax income is changed in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the necessary ones for regarding incentive effects of taxation. It is even more complicated to know the marginal effective tax rate applied to income from business and capital, as it may be reliant on considerations including the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem determines that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is nothing under a consumption-based tax.
Average income tax rates signify the portion of total income that is taken in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is necessary for appraising the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate increases with income. Average income tax rates usually grow with income, both because personal allowances are permitted for the taxpayer and dependents and because marginal tax rates are graduated; on the flip side, preferential treatment of income received predominantly by high-income households could swamp these effects, allowing regressivity, as displayed by average tax rates that lower as income grows.
For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.